asked by guest
on Feb 02, 2025 at 8:04 am
MathBot Answer:
Logic Expression Symbol: ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R \neg \left(\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q\right) \vee \neg R ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R Text: not ( not P implies not Q ) or not R \text{not} \left(\text{not } P \text{ implies } \text{not } Q\right) \text{ or } \text{not } R not ( not P implies not Q ) or not R
Classification contingency
Truth Table
Legend
Symbol Read As ∧ and ↔ if and only if → implies ↑ nand ↓ nor ¬ not ∨ or ⨁ xor \begin{array}{c|c}\textbf{Symbol} & \textbf{Read As} \\ \hline ∧ & \text{and} \\ \hline ↔ & \text{if and only if} \\ \hline → & \text{implies} \\ \hline ↑ & \text{nand} \\ \hline ↓ & \text{nor} \\ \hline ¬ & \text{not} \\ \hline ∨ & \text{or} \\ \hline ⨁ & \text{xor} \end{array} Symbol ∧ ↔ → ↑ ↓ ¬ ∨ ⨁ Read As and if and only if implies nand nor not or xor
P P P Q Q Q R R R ¬ P \neg P ¬ P ¬ Q \neg Q ¬ Q ¬ P → ¬ Q \neg P \rightarrow \neg Q ¬ P → ¬ Q ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) \neg \left(\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q\right) ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ¬ R \neg R ¬ R ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R \neg \left(\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q\right) \vee \neg R ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
T/F
Simplification ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R ≡ ( ¬ P ∧ ¬ ( ¬ Q ) ) ∨ ¬ R Negation of Conditional Equivalence ≡ ( ¬ P ∧ Q ) ∨ ¬ R Double Negation Law \begin{gathered} \neg \left(\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q\right) \vee \neg R & \equiv & \left(\neg P \wedge \neg \left(\neg Q\right)\right) \vee \neg R & \text{Negation of Conditional Equivalence} \\ & \equiv & \left(\neg P \wedge Q\right) \vee \neg R & \text{Double Negation Law} \end{gathered} ¬ ( ¬ P → ¬ Q ) ∨ ¬ R ≡ ≡ ( ¬ P ∧ ¬ ( ¬ Q ) ) ∨ ¬ R ( ¬ P ∧ Q ) ∨ ¬ R Negation of Conditional Equivalence Double Negation Law Note: Solution may not be as simplified as possible.
Conjunctive Normal Form ( ¬ P ∧ Q ) ∨ ¬ R ≡ ( ¬ P ∨ ¬ R ) ∧ ( Q ∨ ¬ R ) Distributive Law \begin{gathered} \left(\neg P \wedge Q\right) \vee \neg R & \equiv & \left(\neg P \vee \neg R\right) \wedge \left(Q \vee \neg R\right) & \text{Distributive Law} \end{gathered} ( ¬ P ∧ Q ) ∨ ¬ R ≡ ( ¬ P ∨ ¬ R ) ∧ ( Q ∨ ¬ R ) Distributive Law Note: Solution may not be as simplified as possible.
Note 1: These equivalences and tautologies are used to generate the above steps. Note 2: Two logical statements are logically equivalent if they always produce the same truth value. Consequently, p ≡ q is same as saying p ↔ q is a tautology. Equivalence Absorption Law p ∧ ( p ∨ q ) ≡ p p ∨ ( p ∧ q ) ≡ p Biconditional Equivalence p ↔ q ≡ ( p ∨ ¬ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ q ) p ↔ q ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ ¬ q ) Biconditional Simplification p ↔ p ≡ True p ↔ True ≡ p p ↔ ¬ p ≡ False p ↔ False ≡ ¬ p Complement Law p ∧ ¬ p ≡ False p ∨ ¬ p ≡ True Conditional Equivalence p → q ≡ ¬ p ∨ q Conditional Simplification p → p ≡ True p → True ≡ True p → False ≡ ¬ p p → ¬ p ≡ ¬ p True → p ≡ p False → p ≡ True ¬ p → p ≡ p Consensus Law ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ r ) ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ r ) ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ r ) ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ r ) De Morgan’s Law ¬ ( p ∧ q ) ≡ ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ¬ ( p ∨ q ) ≡ ¬ p ∧ ¬ q Distributive Law p ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( p ∧ r ) p ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( p ∨ r ) ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( r ∨ s ) ≡ ( p ∧ r ) ∨ ( p ∧ s ) ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ∨ ( q ∧ s ) ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( r ∧ s ) ≡ ( p ∨ r ) ∧ ( p ∨ s ) ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ∧ ( q ∨ s ) Domination Law p ∨ True ≡ True p ∧ False ≡ False Double Negation Law ¬ ( ¬ p ) ≡ p Idempotent Law p ∧ p ≡ p p ∨ p ≡ p Identity Law p ∧ True ≡ p p ∨ False ≡ p NAND p ↑ q ≡ ¬ ( p ∧ q ) Negation Law ¬ True ≡ False ¬ False ≡ True NOR p ↓ q ≡ ¬ ( p ∨ q ) Negation of Biconditional Equivalence ¬ ( p ↔ q ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ) ¬ ( p ↔ q ) ≡ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) Negation of Conditional Equivalence ¬ ( p → q ) ≡ p ∧ ¬ q Redundancy Law (1) ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( p ∨ ¬ q ) ≡ p ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ≡ p Redundancy Law (2) p ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ q ) ≡ p ∧ q p ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) ≡ p ∨ q XOR p ⊕ q ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ) p ⊕ q ≡ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) XOR Simplification p ⊕ p ≡ False p ⊕ True ≡ ¬ p p ⊕ ¬ p ≡ True p ⊕ False ≡ p XNOR p ⊙ q ≡ ¬ ( p ⊕ q ) \begin{array}{c|c}\textbf{Equivalence} \\ \hline \text{Absorption Law} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge \left(p \vee q\right) \equiv p \\ p \vee \left(p \wedge q\right) \equiv p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Biconditional Equivalence} & \begin{gathered} p \leftrightarrow q \equiv \left(p \vee \neg q\right) \wedge \left(\neg p \vee q\right) \\ p \leftrightarrow q \equiv \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(\neg p \wedge \neg q\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Biconditional Simplification} & \begin{gathered} p \leftrightarrow p \equiv \text{True} & p \leftrightarrow \text{True} \equiv p \\ p \leftrightarrow \neg p \equiv \text{False} & p \leftrightarrow \text{False} \equiv \neg p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Complement Law} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge \neg p \equiv \text{False} \\ p \vee \neg p \equiv \text{True} \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Conditional Equivalence} & p \rightarrow q \equiv \neg p \vee q \\ \hline \text{Conditional Simplification} & \begin{gathered} p \rightarrow p \equiv \text{True} & p \rightarrow \text{True} \equiv \text{True} & p \rightarrow \text{False} \equiv \neg p \\ p \rightarrow \neg p \equiv \neg p & \text{True} \rightarrow p \equiv p & \text{False} \rightarrow p \equiv \text{True} \\ \neg p \rightarrow p \equiv p\end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Consensus Law} & \begin{gathered} \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(\neg p \vee r\right) \wedge \left(q \vee r\right) \equiv \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(\neg p \vee r\right) \\ \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(\neg p \wedge r\right) \vee \left(q \wedge r\right) \equiv \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(\neg p \wedge r\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{De Morgan's Law} & \begin{gathered} \neg \left(p \wedge q\right) \equiv \neg p \vee \neg q \\ \neg \left(p \vee q\right) \equiv \neg p \wedge \neg q \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Distributive Law} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge \left(q \vee r\right) \equiv \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(p \wedge r\right) \\ p \vee \left(q \wedge r\right) \equiv \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(p \vee r\right) \\ \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(r \vee s\right) \equiv \left(p \wedge r\right) \vee \left(p \wedge s\right) \vee \left(q \wedge r\right) \vee \left(q \wedge s\right) \\ \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(r \wedge s\right) \equiv \left(p \vee r\right) \wedge \left(p \vee s\right) \wedge \left(q \vee r\right) \wedge \left(q \vee s\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Domination Law} & \begin{gathered} p \vee \text{True} \equiv \text{True} \\ p \wedge \text{False} \equiv \text{False} \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Double Negation Law} & \neg \left(\neg p\right) \equiv p \\ \hline \text{Idempotent Law} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge p \equiv p \\ p \vee p \equiv p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Identity Law} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge \text{True} \equiv p \\ p \vee \text{False} \equiv p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{NAND} & p \uparrow q \equiv \neg \left(p \wedge q\right) \\ \hline \text{Negation Law} & \begin{gathered} \neg \text{True} \equiv \text{False} \\ \neg \text{False} \equiv \text{True} \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{NOR} & p \downarrow q \equiv \neg \left(p \vee q\right) \\ \hline \text{Negation of Biconditional Equivalence} & \begin{gathered} \neg \left(p \leftrightarrow q\right) \equiv \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(\neg p \vee \neg q\right) \\ \neg \left(p \leftrightarrow q\right) \equiv \left(p \wedge \neg q\right) \vee \left(\neg p \wedge q\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Negation of Conditional Equivalence} & \neg \left(p \rightarrow q\right) \equiv p \wedge \neg q \\ \hline \text{Redundancy Law (1)} & \begin{gathered} \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(p \vee \neg q\right) \equiv p \\ \left(p \wedge q\right) \vee \left(p \wedge \neg q\right) \equiv p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Redundancy Law (2)} & \begin{gathered} p \wedge \left(\neg p \vee q\right) \equiv p \wedge q \\ p \vee \left(\neg p \wedge q\right) \equiv p \vee q \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{XOR} & \begin{gathered} p \oplus q \equiv \left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \left(\neg p \vee \neg q\right) \\ p \oplus q \equiv \left(p \wedge \neg q\right) \vee \left(\neg p \wedge q\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{XOR Simplification} & \begin{gathered} p \oplus p \equiv \text{False} & p \oplus \text{True} \equiv \neg p \\ p \oplus \neg p \equiv \text{True} & p \oplus \text{False} \equiv p \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{XNOR} & p \odot q \equiv \neg \left(p \oplus q\right) \end{array} Equivalence Absorption Law Biconditional Equivalence Biconditional Simplification Complement Law Conditional Equivalence Conditional Simplification Consensus Law De Morgan’s Law Distributive Law Domination Law Double Negation Law Idempotent Law Identity Law NAND Negation Law NOR Negation of Biconditional Equivalence Negation of Conditional Equivalence Redundancy Law (1) Redundancy Law (2) XOR XOR Simplification XNOR p ∧ ( p ∨ q ) ≡ p p ∨ ( p ∧ q ) ≡ p p ↔ q ≡ ( p ∨ ¬ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ q ) p ↔ q ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ ¬ q ) p ↔ p ≡ True p ↔ ¬ p ≡ False p ↔ True ≡ p p ↔ False ≡ ¬ p p ∧ ¬ p ≡ False p ∨ ¬ p ≡ True p → q ≡ ¬ p ∨ q p → p ≡ True p → ¬ p ≡ ¬ p ¬ p → p ≡ p p → True ≡ True True → p ≡ p p → False ≡ ¬ p False → p ≡ True ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ r ) ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ r ) ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ r ) ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ r ) ¬ ( p ∧ q ) ≡ ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ¬ ( p ∨ q ) ≡ ¬ p ∧ ¬ q p ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ≡ ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( p ∧ r ) p ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( p ∨ r ) ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( r ∨ s ) ≡ ( p ∧ r ) ∨ ( p ∧ s ) ∨ ( q ∧ r ) ∨ ( q ∧ s ) ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( r ∧ s ) ≡ ( p ∨ r ) ∧ ( p ∨ s ) ∧ ( q ∨ r ) ∧ ( q ∨ s ) p ∨ True ≡ True p ∧ False ≡ False ¬ ( ¬ p ) ≡ p p ∧ p ≡ p p ∨ p ≡ p p ∧ True ≡ p p ∨ False ≡ p p ↑ q ≡ ¬ ( p ∧ q ) ¬ True ≡ False ¬ False ≡ True p ↓ q ≡ ¬ ( p ∨ q ) ¬ ( p ↔ q ) ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ) ¬ ( p ↔ q ) ≡ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) ¬ ( p → q ) ≡ p ∧ ¬ q ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( p ∨ ¬ q ) ≡ p ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ≡ p p ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ q ) ≡ p ∧ q p ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) ≡ p ∨ q p ⊕ q ≡ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ) p ⊕ q ≡ ( p ∧ ¬ q ) ∨ ( ¬ p ∧ q ) p ⊕ p ≡ False p ⊕ ¬ p ≡ True p ⊕ True ≡ ¬ p p ⊕ False ≡ p p ⊙ q ≡ ¬ ( p ⊕ q ) Tautology Conjunctive Simplification ( p ∧ q ) → p ( p ∧ q ) → q Contradiction ¬ ( p ∧ ¬ p ) Contrapositive ( p → q ) ↔ ( ¬ q → ¬ p ) Disjunctive Addition p → ( p ∨ q ) q → ( p ∨ q ) Disjunctive Syllogism ( ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ¬ q ) → p ( ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ¬ p ) → q Hypothetical Syllogism ( ( p → q ) ∧ ( q → r ) ) → ( p → r ) Modus Ponens ( p ∧ ( p → q ) ) → q Modus Tollens ( ¬ q ∧ ( p → q ) ) → ¬ p \begin{array}{c|c}\textbf{Tautology} \\ \hline \text{Conjunctive Simplification} & \begin{gathered} \left(p \wedge q\right) \rightarrow p \\ \left(p \wedge q\right) \rightarrow q \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Contradiction} & \neg \left(p \wedge \neg p\right) \\ \hline \text{Contrapositive} & \left(p \rightarrow q\right) \leftrightarrow \left(\neg q \rightarrow \neg p\right) \\ \hline \text{Disjunctive Addition} & \begin{gathered} p \rightarrow \left(p \vee q\right) \\ q \rightarrow \left(p \vee q\right) \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Disjunctive Syllogism} & \begin{gathered} \left(\left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \neg q\right) \rightarrow p \\ \left(\left(p \vee q\right) \wedge \neg p\right) \rightarrow q \end{gathered} \\ \hline \text{Hypothetical Syllogism} & \left(\left(p \rightarrow q\right) \wedge \left(q \rightarrow r\right)\right) \rightarrow \left(p \rightarrow r\right) \\ \hline \text{Modus Ponens} & \left(p \wedge \left(p \rightarrow q\right)\right) \rightarrow q \\ \hline \text{Modus Tollens} & \left(\neg q \wedge \left(p \rightarrow q\right)\right) \rightarrow \neg p \end{array} Tautology Conjunctive Simplification Contradiction Contrapositive Disjunctive Addition Disjunctive Syllogism Hypothetical Syllogism Modus Ponens Modus Tollens ( p ∧ q ) → p ( p ∧ q ) → q ¬ ( p ∧ ¬ p ) ( p → q ) ↔ ( ¬ q → ¬ p ) p → ( p ∨ q ) q → ( p ∨ q ) ( ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ¬ q ) → p ( ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ¬ p ) → q ( ( p → q ) ∧ ( q → r ) ) → ( p → r ) ( p ∧ ( p → q ) ) → q ( ¬ q ∧ ( p → q ) ) → ¬ p