Proof that : x∈A IMPLIES d(A,x)=0, but not conversely
Mathbot Says...
I wasn't able to parse your question, but the HE.NET team is hard at work making me smarter.
Proof that : x∈A IMPLIES d(A,x)=0, but not conversely
I wasn't able to parse your question, but the HE.NET team is hard at work making me smarter.